Image Tampering, Retouching, and Synthetic Beauty: A Curricular Unit
9 August 2009 / pedagogy, referenceImage Retouching: A Critical Approach for Media Arts Educators
I developed the following course unit on image tampering, retouching and manipulation for my Introduction to the Electronic Media Studio (EMS1) class at Carnegie Mellon. The semester course is intended for first-year students with little or no computer experience, and serves the purpose of introducing students to basic media-editing tools. The emphasis in the course is not on technical mastery but on understanding digital media technologies as tools for creative cultural practice.
The loosely-organized materials I’ve cited below provide starting points for discussions about image manipulation from several perspectives, including: photojournalistic standards of truthtelling; the construction of idealized beauty in vernacular advertising; and the early history of 19th-century photocollages as an extension of narrative romantic painting. I’m grateful to Paolo Pedercini and Rich Pell for their pointers to some of the resources below.
Unit Learning Outcomes:
To demonstrate development of skills in the use of techniques for pixel-based (bitmap) image acquisition, editing, compositing, and output. To demonstrate an awareness of the issues surrounding photographic “truth” and verifiability in the digital era.
Readings:
- Collins, Lauren. “[The World of Fashion] Pixel Perfect: Pascal Dangin’s virtual reality.” The New Yorker, 5/12/2008.
- Farid, Hany. “Photo Tampering Throughout History“. Web site. A thorough chronological compilation of photo-tampering examples, and one of the best classroom resources of its kind.
- Farid, Hany. “Seeing Is Not Believing” IEEE Spectrum Magazine, 8/2009.
- Jesella, Kara. “The Remix: The Skinny, Something To Smile About” The New York Times, 10/22/2006.
- Mitchell, William. “How to do Things with Pictures”. In The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post Photographic Era, MIT Press, 1992. pp 190-223.
- Mitchell, William. “When is Seeing Believing?”. In Scientific American, February 1994. pp 68-73.
- Nir, Sarah Maslin. “No Boo-Boos or Cowlicks? Only in School Pictures“. The New York Times, 11/20/2010.
- Paul, Christiane. “Digital Technologies as a Tool”. In Digital Art, 2004.
- Williams, Alex. “I Was there. Just Ask Photoshop.” The New York Times, 8/15/2008.
- Wilson, Eric. “Smile and Say No Photoshop“. The New York Times, 5/27/2009.
- Software giant Microsoft apologizes for editing a photo to change a black man’s head to that of a white man. 8/26/2009.
- Newman, Jared. Ten More Tech Company Photoshop Disasters. MSNBC, 8/28/2009.
Images:
Examples of historic photographs, artworks and hoax images produced in various ways through photomanipulation.
- Oscar Rejlander: Two Ways of Life (1857)
- Henry Peach Robinson: Women and Children at a Country Party, Study for A Holiday in the Wood, Bringing Home the May, Fading Away (1858)
- Keith Cottingham: Fictitious Portraits (1992) [keep clicking]
- Nancy Burson: Early Composites (1982), Human Race Machine (1999), Jesus Guys (1999).
- Jim Campbell: Illuminated Averages
- Jason Salavon: 100 Special Moments, Homes for Sale, Every Playboy Centerfold
- Mariko Mori: Birth of a Star (1995), Burning Desire
- Aziz & Cucher: Dystopia (1994)
- Andreas Gursky (example)
- “Fauxtography” at Snopes.com, e.g. iceberg, teddy bear cloud, etc.
- Wim Delvoye: Mountains (2000)
- Sabrina Raaf: Test People (2004-2007)
- Snopes: Bert the muppet accidentally collaged into pro-Qaeda propaganda posters.
Video:
- Epstein, Jesse. “Op-Ed: Sex, Lies and Photoshop“, The New York Times, 3/9/2009.
- Epstein, Jesse. “Wet Dreams and False Images“, Independent film, 2008:
- Piper, Tim. “Dove: Evolution“, Advertisement, 2006:
- Additional viewing: Davis, Kiri. “A Girl Like Me.” Independent film, 2006.
Interactions:
- Roth, Evan (fi5e). Detouch. Interactive Processing applet. (+blog post). An interactive applet which allows the viewer to see exactly which pixels have been modified in a before/after retouching comparison.
Assignments:
Questions for Students
Assignment 1. Glamorization and Aging
Assignment 2. A Fiction or A Forgery Create your choice of (A) a fiction or (B) a forgery. Be clear about which of these you have chosen. For the purposes of this assignment: A fiction is a depiction of something derived from your imagination. It depicts something we all would agree is not true, but for which we nonetheless happily suspend our disbelief, because the “reality” it portrays is so interesting or provocative. A fiction asks the question: “What if….?” A forgery is an image which tells a lie. It depicts something which could indeed be true, and it attempts to hid or conceal any evidence or artifacts that would give away the lie. A viewer may doubt the truthfulness of the forgery, but would need to build an argument using external evidence to disprove it. A forgery asks the question: “Did you know….?” Note: The most important challenge of this assignment is to tell a story with an image you’re constructing. Whether that story is from your imagination (a fiction) or is a lie (a forgery) is less critical — since some images could be both a fiction and a forgery. Consider the following strategies for how you might create your fiction/forgery:
Looking for ideas? If you’re not certain where to begin, you could consider making a “chimera” — a creature which is composed of parts of other animals, such as a minotaur (bull+human), griffin (lion+eagle), or something of your own invention. Situate your chimera in its “natural” habitat, etc. Note: this does not imply that you are required to make a chimera. Additional Recommendations: Unless you have a better idea, your image should involve you, somehow. Please use images from photographic sources. These could come from sources like: the web, your camera, a scanner, etc. I recommend that you use images from at least two different photographs to create your fiction/forgery. However, if your concept is very strong, it is conceivable that you could create your fiction/forgery by rearranging elements within a single source image. Develop your image at the highest resolution possible. A recommended final image size is at least 1600×1200, and preferably closer to 3000×2000. To be on the safe side, keep all of your original source files, as well as your Photoshop .PSD project file, until after the assignment has been submitted. Keep these somewhere safe, such as your “workfiles” directory! To do well on this assignment, you’ll need to make a provocative fiction or a convincing forgery. Apart from your image, however, your work will also be judged on how completely you fulfilled the following checklist:
|
Keywords: digital photography, digital imaging, computer imaging, image editing, image manipulation, photo manipulation, image tampering, photo retouching, exaggeration, doctoring, doctored, re-touching, alteration, digitally altered, compositing, composite, collage, software, Photoshop, photoshopping, curriculum, course unit, course materials, classroom materials, educational resource, lecture notes, course prep, curricular unit, slimming, beauty, body image, unattainable, normativity, advertising, imagery, art, illustration, journalism, photojournalism, truth, veracity, forgery, critical approach, contextual study, media literacy, visual literacy, education, educators, teachers.
« Prev post: Golan’s 2009 TED Talk, online
» Next post: Opto-Isolator II in the “Decode” exhibition at the V&A